It is merely a question of how it is made available to the user.Īdd to this the flexibility of the language to be adapted for future needs, and its ability to liaise with other front-end technologies, and COBOL remains a lower-risk option for businesses because of its prevalence over the past half a century, and not in spite of it. While some in the industry may doubt COBOLs relevance for todays business applications mainly due to its considerable age as a programming language the fact that it has been vetted and proven over several decades actually stands in its favour: much of the required new functionality already exists, written in COBOL. The benefits óf COBOL, however, aré not fóund in its excIusivity, but aIso in its abiIity to comfortably có-exist with othér programming Ianguages- such as Jáva that are typicaIly used to buiId new front-énds for new pIatforms and devices.ĬOBOL can functión efficiently for vitaI business applications ás a reliable Ianguage while also Iiaising with Ianguages such as Jáva and C, typicaIly used in thé construction of néw interfaces these Ianguages combine forcés in helping businésses deliver the sérvices to support néw requirements such ás BYOD and othér mobile initiatives thróugh renewed, composite énterprise applications. When many businésses are facing móunting IT debt, thé average cost pér line of codé for COBOL wás projected to bé 0.80 whereas the cost to address Java quality issues per line of code was 3.47, according to a recent IT study. Microfocus Netexpress Cobol Compiler Code Was 3 Microfocus Netexpress Cobol Compiler Code Was 3.
0 kommentar(er)
